Contenuto cancellato Contenuto aggiunto
→‎Template:Nl-conj: nuova sezione
Jcwf (discussione | contributi)
Riga 56:
 
Ciao, so che è un template di 11 anni fa, ma potresti lo stesso scrivere il manuale? --[[User talk:Wim b|Wim b]] 19:53, 16 giu 2019 (CEST)
 
:{{Ping|Wim b}} Ciao. I can understand what you write, but my Italian is otherwise basically nonexistent. Scusi... I certainly cannot write a manual in it, sorry. If you want me to explain the template I can do that.
 
:All the forms of Dutch verbs -except a handful irregular ones- can be derived from three basic primitive forms. Usually the infinitive, the singular past tense and the participle of the perfect (or: past, but that is less accurate) are given. A full verb has a lot of forms although much of it is compound forms with auxiliaries. You can fight endlessly about what to include in a template and on nl.wikt we decided to do a bare minimum on the main page and the full set on a separate page. [https://nl.wiktionary.org/wiki/schenken/vervoeging see e.g. this for a rather big one] If you want I can rewrite/import the template for the complete set.
 
The Nl-conj template basically has four parameters:
# the infinitive
# the singular past tense
# the participle
# a parameter to enter the morphological class (possibly to generate a category) I was thinking of values '''d,t,cht,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,mix,irr'''
 
:Dutch verbs can be divided in two main groups by '''morphology''': weak and strong, plus some irregulars
::There are 3 groups of weak verbs: forms that take -de in the past, that take -te and a small group that takes -cht and shows some vowel changes
::There are 7 classes of strong verbs that all form the past by various vowel changes.
:::Class 3 has a subgroup that is a kind of hybrid between 3 and 7. Sometimes indicated as 3b
::There is a mixed group with weak past but strong participle
::There is a group of irregular verbs
::There are incomplete verbs
 
There is more to be said about Dutch verbs. Morphologically they can also be
#basic
#inseperable
#separable
 
And syntactically they can be
#impersonal
#transitive
#ditransitive
#intransitive, but there are clearly two different groups that take different auxiliaries:
##inergative
##ergative
#reflexive
#reciprocal, although there are no verbs that are reciprocal-only
#absolute
 
The same verb can be used in more than one way, so we usually add a tag to each definition.
 
 
[[Utente:Jcwf|Jcwf]] <small>([[User talk:Jcwf|disc.]])</small> 22:28, 26 giu 2019 (CEST)